Linux is not Microsoft's target

I think we're maybe being a bit too hasty in our assumptions that Microsoft is attempting to kill Linux through this unspecified patents thing. If I wanted to be a bit impolite, I'd say that we're too wrapped up in our illusionary self-importance.

"The pawn is the most important piece of the chess board - to a pawn."

The truth is, Microsoft is just using unspecified Linux patent threats in order to get access to valuable patents held by other companies. You hadn't noticed that Fuji Xerox, Samsung and LG have signed agreements with Microsoft that allow it access to these companies' patents?

http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=199101753

"The two companies on Wednesday said the deal would cover patents related to Samsung's existing and future product lines, such as computer products, set-top boxes, digital media players, camcorders, televisions, printers, and home appliances. Microsoft, on the other hand, would get access to Samsung intellectual property related to digital media and computers."

So, Samsung gets nothing that it hasn't already had; and Microsoft gets unrestricted access to Samsung's technology. Remember, Samsung do more than make LCD screens - they also make flash memory, hybrid hard disks, and all sorts of other things!

More worrying is Fuji Xerox. There's an awful lot of patents and IP that Fuji Xerox holds that could be built into Windows, in an attempt to kill the Macintosh for graphics and typesetting work. Such an attempt would succeed, as Apple hasn't been paying attention to this section of the market.

If TiVo goes into negotiations with Microsoft, then you know that what I'm saying is true. Microsoft, obviously, wants to tie up the Media Centre market, and TiVo is the logical choice for doing that (and the first step). Not to mention Samsung and LG, who are also makers of DVRs.

So, keep hacking away as usual, but pay attention to what Microsoft is doing. We're sorta the indirect target, but our livelihood could be threatened by Microsoft's actions. I guess I'm trying to say "Be alert, be alarmed, but the sky isn't falling yet".

Eurovision: The Good, The Bad, and the Piss Poor

The good: Scooch (United Kingdom) didn't come last. They actually got 7 points from Ireland and 12 points from Malta. I did like how when David held up the bottle, it had "Bucks Fizz" printed on the label :-)

The bad: Ireland had a much better song than Scooch or indeed most of the other countries, and yet they came last. Unfair.

The piss-poor: Ukraine. I mean, wtf were the voters thinking? The Ukrainian "song" was repetitive, unoriginal, boring, and braindead. Critics of Scooch surely can't think that the Ukraine entry was worthy of second place.

Congratulations to Serbia. Their song wasn't what I would have voted for, but it was probably one of the better ones (note: I don't know what the song was about, so lyrically it may have been excellent). Sorta reminded me a little bit of Mylene Farmer, but only a little :-)

Accidental Goatse reference in an ad

Oh dear. A health insurance company has an advertisement on Australian TV with an unintentional (?) reference to Goatse. I managed to get a video of that part, and now I've put it up on Youtube: (you can't embed objects in Friendster blogs, so here's a link)

Accidental Goatse reference in advertisement
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LAAiL3DcOT8

Epiphany default browser again

In my post entitled "Cool Epiphany Feature", I said that I thought Epiphany should be the default browser in Ubuntu. At the time, I didn't realise that this had been considered for Breezy (current version of Ubuntu), and reconsidered for Dapper (next version of Ubuntu). There's a whole page on the Ubuntu Wiki about the pros and cons of Firefox and Epiphany as default browsers.

Also, someone started a new topic about the debate on the Ubuntu forum.

Anyway, I trust the Ubuntu developers in their decision; and I realise that it might be some work to stop Epiphany (and every other Gecko-based application) from depending on Firefox being installed. So I withdraw my statement.

(but I do think Epiphany is a great browser and that the move should be considered at each new Ubuntu version)